AI Hallucinations – Jakes v Youngblood et All: “Even more outrageously, when accused of a serious ethical violation…attorney…chose to double down.”

ai-hallucinations-warning

"Even more outrageously, a review of Youngblood’s reply brief demonstrates that it too includes fabricated quotes and misrepresents case law. In other words, when accused of a serious ethical violation, attorney [B] chose to double down. This is very troubling. The Court views [B]’s conduct as a clear ethical violation of the highest order."

Read MoreAI Hallucinations – Jakes v Youngblood et All: “Even more outrageously, when accused of a serious ethical violation…attorney…chose to double down.”

7 Key Insights: Lord Justice Birss Considers AI in Civil Justice. What Expert Witnesses and Housing Lawyers Must Know

ai-in-civil-justice-insights

“...I will explain it by reference to the judicial guidance we have promulgated on AI. This emphasises that individual judges take full personal responsibility for what goes out in their name. So, just like a Google search on the internet, AI also can be handy for reminding you of something you knew but had forgotten, but also just like googling, AI is a poor and unsafe tool for finding the answer to a question you do not yourself know and cannot recognise as correct...”

Lord Justice Birss

Read More7 Key Insights: Lord Justice Birss Considers AI in Civil Justice. What Expert Witnesses and Housing Lawyers Must Know

Is Your Firm or Chambers Ready? Could Your Heads of Chambers, Partners, or Others Face Sanctions? How Far Does AI Liability Reach? 10 Crucial AI Supervision Questions from Landmark AI Hallucinations Case.

"We would go further however. There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused. In those circumstances, practical and effective measures must now be taken by those within the legal profession with individual leadership responsibilities (such as heads of chambers and managing partners) and by those with the responsibility for regulating the provision of legal services. Those measures must ensure that every individual currently providing legal services within this jurisdiction (whenever and wherever they were qualified to do so) understands and complies with their professional and ethical obligations and their duties to the court if using artificial intelligence. For the future, in Hamid hearings such as these, the profession can expect the court to inquire whether those leadership responsibilities have been fulfilled." Dame Victoria Sharp

Read MoreIs Your Firm or Chambers Ready? Could Your Heads of Chambers, Partners, or Others Face Sanctions? How Far Does AI Liability Reach? 10 Crucial AI Supervision Questions from Landmark AI Hallucinations Case.

AI Hallucinations – Another Case From the US: Are Court Penalties ‘Moot’ Due to ‘Significant and Irreversible Harm’ to Professional Reputation?

AI Hallucinations

“...That said, in considering an appropriate sanction the Court takes into account the steps [Lawyer] has taken "to educate himself on the responsible use of AI in legal practice" and adhere to "the highest standards of professional conduct moving forward..."

Read MoreAI Hallucinations – Another Case From the US: Are Court Penalties ‘Moot’ Due to ‘Significant and Irreversible Harm’ to Professional Reputation?