"...What is remarkable when reading those chats is, first, that one would think that the text attributed to the AI was produced by an intelligent human being. The second remarkable thing is that, on a large number of occasions, it is plainly wrong or, at the very least, extremely misleading."

"While litigants in person in the FTT are (entirely appropriately) given a greater degree of latitude in their conduct of the proceedings than represented parties, no person has immunity from sanction when committing a serious breach of court or tribunal rules..."

"There was no good reason for either the Defendant or [redacted] to use ChatGPT in this case. Both struck me as sophisticated people... Both the Defendant and [redacted] are sufficiently technically adept to have used ChatGPT. They must have been able to use the spelling and grammar checking facility in Word (which the Defendant used to prepare his first draft) and in whatever word processing programme [redacted] used to prepare her first draft."

"207. The Commission emphasises that the world has seen the rapid development of artificial intelligence very recently with risks that, unless constrained by domestic and international law, States may use digital technologies to suppress dissent. In the domestic context, the uses to which LFR may be put, and the technology which supports it, will doubtless evolve but this claim is concerned with the terms of the Policy under challenge and (as we have said) its lawfulness now. We see no reason to take a different approach to Bridges."

“Unfortunately, for me at least, the tangential scattergun, smorgasbord approaches and references coupled with euphemisms formed outside of Europe approaches of this tool were a poor second to human oversight, I have come to expect and anticipate in actual statement and representation during a case.”

Key Takeaway This article analyses two new AI hallucination cases from the…

"...There is no reason why that duty should not also apply to lay persons, as otherwise the management of cases in courts and therefore the course of justice could be significantly obstructed..."