Lady Carr on AI in Legal Education and Judicial Practice: Preparing Lawyers for the Future
Ad/Marketing Communication This legal article/report forms part of my ongoing legal commentary…
Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Law
Professional website of Matthew Lee (Barrister, England & Wales). Ad/Marketing communication not legal advice. No Public/Direct Access. Instructions via clerks see contact details below.
Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Law
Professional website of Matthew Lee (Barrister, England & Wales). Ad/Marketing communication not legal advice. No Public/Direct Access. Instructions via clerks see contact details below.
Read MoreLady Carr on AI in Legal Education and Judicial Practice: Preparing Lawyers for the Future
AI reference in Supreme Court of Queensland in Youssef v Eckersley & Anor [2024] QSC 35
Chat GPT “…assisted in their organisational structure and added a flourish to his submissions…"
AI and Disability: Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) of Australia Decision on Disability Supports
Ultimately, this case highlights the importance of tribunals developing a thorough understanding of AI technologies within the specific legal frameworks they operate under, especially when dealing with vulnerable individuals and equality considerations. Recognising and properly evaluating nuanced differences in AI capabilities will be essential to accurately assessing their true value and ensuring fairness in future decisions.
How Rogue Landlords Might Use AI Against Tenants and How to Fight Back!
Landlords already profile tenants, but AI expands profiling capabilities dramatically. AI-driven software can rapidly compile comprehensive profiles, including credit histories, employment records, and even social media content, to discriminate, directly or indirectly, against tenants they deem less desirable.
2408529 (Refugee): [2024] AATA 3353 – Chat GPT used for submissions
Ad/Marketing Communication This legal article/report forms part of my ongoing legal commentary…
ChatGPT Enters Courtroom Expert Evidence: Analysing AI’s Reliability and Procedural Fairness in Australian Law – Gauci v Roo [2024] NSWDC 361.
“…[An expert’s] resort to AI, Chat-GPT suggests to me that, in the absence of evidence, I ought not infer expertise in radiology in those without qualifications in that discipline.”
Precedent or Pretence? Lessons from Harber v HMRC
“But that does not mean that citing invented judgments is harmless. It causes the Tribunal and HMRC to waste time and public money, and this reduces the resources available to progress the cases of other court users who are waiting for their appeals to be determined. As Judge Kastel said, the practice also "promotes cynicism" about judicial precedents, and this is important, because the use of precedent is "a cornerstone of our legal system" and "an indispensable foundation upon which to decide what is the law and its application to individual cases"
