Professional website of Matthew Lee (Barrister, England & Wales). Ad/Marketing communication not legal advice. No Public/Direct Access. Instructions via clerks see contact details below.
Professional website of Matthew Lee (Barrister, England & Wales). Ad/Marketing communication not legal advice. No Public/Direct Access. Instructions via clerks see contact details below.
As AI is utilised in the ways outlined above, the legal and investigative processes will likely need to evolve rapidly to respond effectively. Courts will likely see a significant increase in cases involving technologically sophisticated deception, such as deepfakes and AI-generated documents, creating unique evidential challenges.
It may well be that AI development slows sufficiently in the coming years, giving us, as a profession, the time to fully digest and strategically implement these tools. However, I fear this scenario is unlikely. The more probable outcome is that AI technology evolves exponentially, and at that stage, the pressing question may shift from "How can we effectively use AI tools in practice?" to "What value can we, as legal professionals, add to an AI-driven system?" I appreciate that this is a daunting prospect for many; nevertheless, it is something we may soon need to seriously consider.
Ad/Marketing Communication This legal article/report forms part of my ongoing legal commentary on the use of artificial intelligence within the justice system. It supports my work in teaching, lecturing, and writing about AI and the law and is published to…
“The claimant sought to rely on a conversation with ChatGPT as expert evidence that the respondent’s explanation regarding the difficulty and time involved in extracting the data was false. He had been informed by REJ Davies on 11 June 2024 that he did not have permission to adduce AI generated documents… I would add that even if there had been, a record of a ChatGPT discussion would not in my judgment be evidence that could sensibly be described as expert evidence nor could it be deemed reliable.” Employment Judge S Moore
“The claimant then said to the tribunal that he would use ‘Chat GPT’ to produce his submissions and would ‘see what came out’. The judge said that, in his knowledge of other occasions when unrepresented parties had sought to write their submissions using Chat GPT, this had resulted in submissions which were not necessarily tailored to the issues and were of little help to the tribunal. However, the claimant nonetheless indicated that that was what he was intending to do.” Employment Judge Baty
Ad/Marketing Communication This legal article/report forms part of my ongoing legal commentary on the use of artificial intelligence within the justice system. It supports my work in teaching, lecturing, and writing about AI and the law and is published to…
Ad/Marketing Communication This legal article/report forms part of my ongoing legal commentary on the use of artificial intelligence within the justice system. It supports my work in teaching, lecturing, and writing about AI and the law and is published to…
Chat GPT “…assisted in their organisational structure and added a flourish to his submissions…"
Ad/Marketing Communication This legal article/report forms part of my ongoing legal commentary on the use of artificial intelligence within the justice system. It supports my work in teaching, lecturing, and writing about AI and the law and is published to…
“…[An expert’s] resort to AI, Chat-GPT suggests to me that, in the absence of evidence, I ought not infer expertise in radiology in those without qualifications in that discipline.”
