“F accepts using ChatGPT in his statements. There is no prohibition upon a party from doing so. The risks of doing so are clear from R (Ayinde) v. London Borough of Hackney and Ors [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin), a case in which the High Court was considering the citation of fake cases by regulated lawyers, Dame Victoria Sharp P said: “Freely available generative artificial intelligence tools, trained on a large language model such as ChatGPT are not capable of conducting reliable legal research. Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect. The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue. They may cite sources that do not exist. They may purport to quote passages from a genuine source that do not appear in that source”.